Elizabeth. (1985)patibility during the mother or father-baby relationship: Root and processes

Lamb, Yards. Elizabeth., & Gilbride, K. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). If I am not saying beautiful, have you been sexy or perhaps not?: Physical-appeal evaluations and you may relationships choice just like the a purpose of your very own elegance. Psychological Research, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other intimate relationship. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of aspiration. Within the J. McV. Seem (Ed.), Identification and the choices disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Press. [ Website links ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationship dating destiny having insiders’ and you can outsiders’ angle: Just who and you may what is actually expected issues. Private Dating, thirteen, 349-362. [ Website links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you can relationship quality when you look at the newly weds: Two centered strategy. Diary of Identification and you will Social Therapy, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, An excellent. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, E. Roentgen. (2006). Seen similarity and you will matchmaking achievement certainly one of relationship people: An idiographic approach. [ Website links ]

Madden, M., & Lenhart, A beneficial. (2006). Internet dating. Washington, DC: Declaration into Pew Internet sites & American Life Investment. Retrieved , out-of [ Backlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Examining the precision out of predictions on the matchmaking dating: Just how and why do lovers’ forecasts differ from those produced by perceiver? Personality and you will Public Psychology Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Website links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing products about initiation from heterosexual relationships. Paper exhibited at First All over the world Appointment towards the Private Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Website links ]

Log from Societal and private Relationship, 23, 865-880

Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try real similarity very important to appeal? An effective meta-study off genuine and thought similarity. Journal sexy Trinidad women regarding Personal and private Dating, 25, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]

Digital relationships and you may virtual associated: Conceptualizing computers mediated personal relationship

Morry, M. Meters. (2005). Matchmaking pleasure given that good predictor out-of similarity reviews; An examination of your own attraction-similarity theory. Record regarding Social and private Matchmaking, twenty-two, 561-584. [ Website links ]

Morry, Meters. M. (2007). The latest destination-resemblance theory certainly mix-intercourse relatives: Relationships pleasure, recognized parallels, and you may care about-serving attitudes. Record from Social and private Dating, 24, 117-138. [ Hyperlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). A clarification and you may expansion of SVR concept out-of dyadic combining. Log from ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can breakup: A beneficial fourteen-season longitudinal examination of black people and you will white people. Diary out of Social and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). The latest love algorithm Fits thinks this has discover an algorithm for ruling the online relationships providers: A technical approach to finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Correct. Company 2.0 Magazine. Retrieved into regarding [ Backlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent survive – Identification parallels inside lovers. Character and Private Variations, forty five, 533-535. [ Website links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Spouse choice: Just what attributes carry out men and women interest inside their brief-label intimate and you will long-title intimate lovers? Record out of Therapy and you may Individual Sex, a dozen, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). New part of the notice on the initiation and span of personal correspondence. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you will in conflict relationship (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]